As administrations change, so can the policies and priorities that shape intellectual property (IP) rights, particularly within the realm of government contracting. While the fundamental frameworks governing IP in this context remain rooted in statutes and regulations, the nuances of their application can shift, presenting new opportunities and challenges for contractors. Let’s explore how a new administration might influence the IP landscape for companies engaged in government contracts.
Every administration brings its own regulatory agenda, which can directly affect the treatment of IP in government contracts. For example, a new administration may be more, or less, pro-innovation, meaning priorities may shift between encouraging innovation through small business-friendly IP policies or favoring the government's rights to use, modify, and distribute IP developed under its contracts. A focus on technology, cybersecurity, or emerging fields such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing could result in:
For small businesses participating in the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs, shifts in funding priorities and policies can affect IP rights profoundly. A new administration may prioritize funding for specific industries, aligning SBIR/STTR solicitations accordingly. It may also modify protections for data generated under these programs, potentially altering the exclusivity period small businesses currently enjoy. And finally, an emphasis on commercialization pathways could complicate IP protection for dual-use technologies, requiring companies to alter their IP strategies in proposals.
Global trade policies often see significant adjustments under new leadership, and these can influence IP provisions in international contracts. For instance, changes in international trade agreements may impact the enforcement of IP rights overseas or the terms under which foreign contractors collaborate with U.S. entities. An administration less interested in international standards might promote domestic use of foreign technologies, and cause international IP protection to be more tenuous. Such changes will require contractors to rethink how to protect proprietary technologies at home and abroad.
IP compliance and enforcement can also evolve under a new administration. Agencies responsible for overseeing government contracts, such as the Department of Defense (DoD) or the General Services Administration (GSA), might:
Government contractors can take proactive steps to navigate potential changes in the IP landscape:
The advent of a new presidential administration can bring both uncertainty and opportunity to government contractors navigating the complex interplay of IP and federal procurement. By remaining vigilant, adaptable, and well-informed, contractors can position themselves to protect and leverage their IP while meeting the government’s evolving needs. Martensen IP is here to provide guidance and support as you navigate this dynamic landscape. Contact us to learn more.